Context Recall
rag.context_recall
Measures how fully the retrieved material covers the evidence needed to support the reference answer.
Contract
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
version | 1.0.0 |
metric_type | pointwise |
scorer_contract | per_row |
direction | higher_is_better |
entrypoint | aip_metrics_rag.answered.context_recall |
target_kind | None |
Required columns
input_idpromptexpected_outputsut_responseretrieved_context
Accepted schemas
[
{
"name": "gdi_text_v1",
"task_types": [
"multi_turn_rag",
"single_turn_rag"
]
}
]
Methodology
- An LLM judge (Ragas context_recall) receives the question, the reference answer, and the retrieved contexts.
- Ragas breaks the reference answer into individual claims.
- The judge decides, per claim, whether it is attributable to the retrieved contexts.
- The score is the fraction of attributable claims, normalised to 0-1.
Score semantics
Scores range 0-1, the fraction of reference-answer claims that are attributable to the retrieved context. A high score means the retrieval brought back the evidence the answer relies on; a low score means ground-truth information is missing. Higher is better.
Worked example
A reference answer with 4 claims where the retrieved context supports 3 of them scores 3/4 = 0.75.
Configuration schema
{
"properties": {
"concurrency_limit": {
"default": 10,
"title": "Concurrency Limit",
"type": "integer",
"x-aip-param-role": "operational"
},
"inverted": {
"default": false,
"title": "Inverted",
"type": "boolean",
"x-aip-param-role": "scoring_metadata"
},
"lang": {
"default": "en",
"enum": [
"en",
"de",
"fr"
],
"title": "Lang",
"type": "string"
},
"max": {
"default": 1.0,
"title": "Max",
"type": "number",
"x-aip-param-role": "scoring_metadata"
},
"metric_name": {
"default": "context_recall",
"title": "Metric Name",
"type": "string",
"x-aip-param-role": "scoring_metadata"
},
"min": {
"default": 0.0,
"title": "Min",
"type": "number",
"x-aip-param-role": "scoring_metadata"
},
"model": {
"anyOf": [
{
"type": "string"
},
{
"type": "null"
}
],
"default": "gpt-4o",
"title": "Model"
},
"system_type": {
"const": "rag",
"default": "rag",
"title": "System Type",
"type": "string",
"x-aip-param-role": "judge_wiring"
},
"weight": {
"default": 1.0,
"title": "Weight",
"type": "number",
"x-aip-param-role": "scoring_metadata"
}
},
"title": "InitializationConfig",
"type": "object"
}
Execution
{
"emits_metric_family": false,
"function_name": null,
"max_concurrency": 8,
"processing_kind": "network",
"stream_batch_size": 5000,
"timeout_seconds": 21600
}
Complete manifest
accepts:
- name: gdi_text_v1
task_types:
- multi_turn_rag
- single_turn_rag
config_schema:
properties:
concurrency_limit:
default: 10
title: Concurrency Limit
type: integer
x-aip-param-role: operational
inverted:
default: false
title: Inverted
type: boolean
x-aip-param-role: scoring_metadata
lang:
default: en
enum:
- en
- de
- fr
title: Lang
type: string
max:
default: 1.0
title: Max
type: number
x-aip-param-role: scoring_metadata
metric_name:
default: context_recall
title: Metric Name
type: string
x-aip-param-role: scoring_metadata
min:
default: 0.0
title: Min
type: number
x-aip-param-role: scoring_metadata
model:
anyOf:
- type: string
- type: 'null'
default: gpt-4o
title: Model
system_type:
const: rag
default: rag
title: System Type
type: string
x-aip-param-role: judge_wiring
weight:
default: 1.0
title: Weight
type: number
x-aip-param-role: scoring_metadata
title: InitializationConfig
type: object
dependencies: []
description: How fully does the retrieved material cover the evidence needed for the
answer?
direction: higher_is_better
display_name: Context Recall
entrypoint: aip_metrics_rag.answered.context_recall
execution:
emits_metric_family: false
function_name: null
max_concurrency: 8
processing_kind: network
stream_batch_size: 5000
timeout_seconds: 21600
kind: metric
manifest_version: '1'
max_prompt_slots: 0
metric_metadata:
methodology:
- An LLM judge (Ragas context_recall) receives the question, the reference answer,
and the retrieved contexts.
- Ragas breaks the reference answer into individual claims.
- The judge decides, per claim, whether it is attributable to the retrieved contexts.
- The score is the fraction of attributable claims, normalised to 0-1.
score_semantics: Scores range 0-1, the fraction of reference-answer claims that
are attributable to the retrieved context. A high score means the retrieval brought
back the evidence the answer relies on; a low score means ground-truth information
is missing. Higher is better.
summary: Measures how fully the retrieved material covers the evidence needed to
support the reference answer.
worked_example: A reference answer with 4 claims where the retrieved context supports
3 of them scores 3/4 = 0.75.
metric_type: pointwise
name: rag.context_recall
partition_types: []
required_columns:
- input_id
- prompt
- expected_output
- sut_response
- retrieved_context
required_kinds: []
scorer_contract: per_row
target_kind: null
unsupported_trace_shapes: []
version: 1.0.0